Thursday, September 8, 2016

WDT: Judge to decide Hillary’s fate in murder trial, second DNA hearing denied

        A jury of his peers will not decide the fate of Oral "Nic: Hillary. Judge Felix Catena will decide from the bench and the request for that obviously stems from the believe a judge will view the lack of evidence as reasonable doubt and an acquittal will come....A juty will a little risky, especially a hung jury with another trial....Kinda like the guy from the 'Burg.

Watertown Daily Times | Judge to decide Hillary’s fate in murder trial, second DNA hearing denied

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm waiting for the translation of this post. I thought you were conversant in the English language. You need an editor.

Anonymous said...

"Obviously" you say? It is only obvious to those of you who apparently have seen all the evidence.
More likely they figure they had more of a chance of getting a jury full of racists, then of getting a judge that doesn't hate Mary Rain.

Anonymous said...

Yeah,that post is unreadable,too many cocktails at Pete's tonight?

Anonymous said...

Translation: Defense realized they were likely to have at least some diehard jurors that would never acquit, and does not want a second trial where further refinement of testing might allow DNA evidence. The defense must be reasonably confident this judge will acquit - we should know in the next two weeks.

Anonymous said...

You never want to sit in front of a jury. Never. To many ways one person can sway the whole bunch into a guilty charge, and prison is your next stop.

Anonymous said...

1202... You will know within three days from the start possibly the first day..
This is absolutely insane... Will the prosecution present their evidence.. Witneses.. none... Finger prints.. none. Dna none.. anybody see him near the scene.. None... Motive.. None
His only fault is he had feelings for a very loose woman... So did several others... Who was the last person to see the boy alive.. Teacher at school or John Jones.. hmmmmm.. Jones didnt tell the entire truth when spoken to about the case.. Hmmmmmmmmmm what was he hiding...Hmmmmm.
. Case dismissed.....
Civil suite after Potsdam civil matter is over.
Too many promises made when running for office must have come after swilling champange.

Anonymous said...

3:04, If you never want to sit in front of a jury, then why do so many defendants opt to do so? It worked for Oxley. If I were a minority on trial in a county with five colleges, I would rather hang my hat on getting some libtard college professor on my jury. Guaranteed worse case would be a hung jury, 143 out of 144 times.

Anonymous said...

This case will cost the SLC taxpayers millions !!

Anonymous said...

6:32 - this is why we have trials, we get to see whatever evidence there is. Ironically, because DA Rain campaigned on prosecuting Hillary, she had to move prematurely to indict him without any concrete evidence. Given time, DNA testing would have progressed to the point where scientific evidence would have pointed to Hilllary, but it is not yet being sufficiently reliable to be admissible as evidence at trial. Hillary should be thanking DA Rain, as the only evidence now available will be circumstantial.

Anonymous said...

To many of you watch Matlock. This man's lawyers know a judge is the way to go. They now have crap for evidence. They were to lazy to get more. No big CSI team here. Plus you add the possible hate the people around here have for Hillary. He walks.