Saturday, August 27, 2016

Here’s what we need to know about Rep. Elise Stefanik’s support for Donald Trump « The In Box

      The media is so feminized now they all think and function like Mika. Here's an NPR piece excoriating Rep. Elise Stefanik for her support....not highly demonstrative....but support of Donald Trump for President.
      Why does she have to rationalize it. ? Why does Mike Derrick have to justify his support for....oh he hasn't said...We'll we assume he supports Crooked Hillary.
       Elise Stefanik is no different from any of us...we want change but have some misgivings about the Donald...but also realize if its a binary choice, there is no choice but Trump.
      After Labor Day, I'll be putting my Stefanik sign out front and it won't depend on whether she explains to NPR, PerryKos or Scotty World why she is voting for The Donald.
Here’s what we need to know about Rep. Elise Stefanik’s support for Donald Trump « The In Box

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

This makes the polls very suspicious. When expressing publicly that she supports Trump, it ends up being a hassle for Stefanik. Or when Doctor Drew speaks the truth about Hilary's health, he gets fired. It all means that there is likely a lot more voters who will vote for Trump than who are willing to say so publicly.

Anonymous said...

Something like you asking anyone in studio who they're voting for, but when you're asked you hem and haw.

Anonymous said...

The hypocrisy is not also demanding that Derrick say who he voted for in the primary -- Clinton or Sanders -- and why? It's a legitimate question which would be duly instructive. Just because he wants to evade the question to not offend one part of his base or the other is of no consequence. Both questions or neither.

Anonymous said...

After the way the media has treated Stefanik she should say A Big FU to Brian Mann and to his little emasculated manhood.

It appears that Stefanik has wised up to the media. Why the hysteria from Mann, he knows her Democratic opponent is going down in flames. If Mann was such an unbiased reporter there would be 10 questions that he could pose to her opponent about Hillary and her corrupt State Dept. and the Clinton Foundation.

Take the high road Stefanik ignore Mann and his ilk and let the toadies show how low they can go.

hermit thrush said...

The media is so feminized now they all think and function like Mika.

that is ... quite the pejorative. i guess it makes sense that you're drawn to a guy whose campaign ceo publishes things like "birth control makes women unattractive and crazy," and "would you rather your child had feminism or cancer?"