Sunday, July 31, 2016

WDT: Questions Raised on Whether Hillary is a Change Agent

    Sounds like our friends in the pinnacle of political thought in Watertown are having a challenge embracing Hillary Clinton. The 260 editorial board asks if Secretary Clinton can ever really be the agent of change the nation seems to want.
     Folks there would have clearly wanted a Kasich like candidate for the GOP, but Trump is what they got and today's editorial suggests a sympathy for his candidacy..
    Endorsements are largely perfunctory and predictable at the major papers.  Often they endorse months ahead of the election. So all that's left is to see what smaller papers do.
http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/opinion/the-challenge-ahead-hillary-clinton-must-convince-voters-shes-a-good-agent-for-change-20160731

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh don't you fret, Perrykos will land where they were always going to land, on the side of the first First Lady.

Note that our paper of record decided to zero in on the "I alone can fix it" phrase and criticize it? Criticize it as if the president is not the most powerful person in the world. As if Trump is not uniquely qualified. Implying Trump was supposed to say "I as president will be one of many who can fix this". Of course not...he is supposed to be selling himself to get elected.

In the end, the WDT's will endorse the womyn who will bring about more centralized decision making and hand-outs instead of hand-ups, which the democrats stand for. Sure, the Times will complain about IDA's once in a while but their main desire will be to get those IDA's funded and ruled out of DC along with our healthcare, education, mandated diets, mandated exercise programs and political censorship.

Anonymous said...

Why would we listen to anyone not even smart enough to spell "woman"?

Anonymous said...

“Why would we listen to anyone not even smart enough to spell "woman"?”

Maybe this will help explain it.

Donald Trump makes three spelling mistakes in one 21-word tweet attacking Hillary Clinton:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-spelling-mistakes-tweet-twitter-three-lose-loose-cannon-honer-a7164206.html

Anonymous said...

1:03, it was spelled that way on porpoise...get it?

Anonymous said...


Hillary is going to be an excellent President. Not only do I support her, but I am also willing to back it up with my hard earned money. I do not make a lot, but I am willing to give what I can to make sure that the idiot "Donald Trump" is never allowed to put his finger on the button. VIVA La CINTON!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Duh, no kidding 4:26. It just ain't funny after seeing it 100 different posts, get it?

Anonymous said...

2:45, I'm willing to bet Trump knows there aren't 57 states, unlike your thug in the WH.

Anonymous said...

12:25

Obama is not a thug. He may be an agent provocateur or a useful idiot, but he is not a thug