Thursday, July 14, 2016

77 people feared dead in Bastille Day attack in Nice | Daily Mail Online

    Another atrocity apparently at the hands of our Islamic extremist friends.  Bastille Day celebrations in Nice, France turn to terror as some animal drives a truck through a crowd of revelers.
     Meanwhile back here, politics took a back seat as Donald Trump postponed his VP announcement thought to be Governor Mike Pence of Indiana. One hitch is , Mr. Pence faces a noon Friday deadline to get his name off the Gubernatorial ballot, so it has to be him.
       Solid , sober choice who could help balance off Mr. Trump's personality and lack of relationships with some on the right.
        Funny how the MSM ridicules Trump for holding tryouts with the finalists at rallies when Mrs. Clinton is doing the same thing. Today she appeared with Senator Kaine of VA.
        The other thing they make fun of are the speakers at the RNC......Hey I want to see what Natalie Gulbis has to say.
77 people feared dead in Bastille Day attack in Nice | Daily Mail Online

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

We need common sense truck control.
Probably should not allow trucks in the hands of those on the no fly list.

Unknown said...

These attacks are a result of seven and a half years of appeasement. Trumps' ideas make more sense every day.

Anonymous said...

His log book better be in good shape or he's in serious trouble with the DOT man...

Anonymous said...

What are the dannies going to say about this? The man used a truck of all things. Imagine what is going to happen when mussies discover gasoline. But for now, we need common sense truck control.
Background checks for truck licenses, a five day waiting period before you get the keys, only 15 minutes of gas allowed, and NO BLACK TRUCKS. If I didn't know better, I would swear this was an racist attack by and assault truck. Aren't all big trucks racist, per se?

hermit thrush said...

seven and a half years of appeasement! dear lord. ask bin laden about that.

Anonymous said...

Trucks were never designed to kill 942, guns are. Your comparison makes no sense. :D

If trump wins 944, will he stop appeasing the Islamic countries he has business dealings with? As in Dubai, the UAE, Qatar and Kuwait? My favorite is his plans to build a hotel in Saudi Arabia. Particularly after donald bashed the country over their involvment in the 9/11 attacks. He is a hypocrite and liar.

Anonymous said...

3:58am

The Clintons have taken money from foreign entities in exchange for favors for over two decades. Trump has no track record as an elected official, but I do not believe it is possible that he could ever reach the level of their corruption.

Anonymous said...

Kilptrap, you're right. This is just a JV team. In fact it has nothing to do with Izzlam. You know, that fine bunch who helped build the very fabric of our nation. You're such an owned idiot. It's never too late to find your brain.

Anonymous said...

3:58/Dannie, ANYTHING can be used to kill. It's the killing itself, stupid. The argument makes perfect sense, but probably not to a deep thinker like yourself. It is not guns, it is people who consider killing others an option. One barf your ilk often uses is guns can kill a lot of people, whereas baseball bats and knives, not so much. Now that trucks are on the loose, we may have to rethink that. But I realize you are simply mouthing what you are told to puke. GooBoy, Dan.

Anonymous said...

And Lemcrap, please don't invoke the name of our Lord. Coming from you, that's a bit too much to handle. Isn't your party the one that booed God at a recent convention? Don't be a lying hypocrite, as it were. Stand up for what you believe in. And it ain't God.

Anonymous said...

No, Danny guns are designed to kill. Most guns do not kill anyone, if they were designed to kill, they would kill. But that doesn't matter in the least, as far as arguments go, because guns are protected in the Constitution. The vast number of guns are not USED to kill, they are used to protect. Meanwhile a higher percentage of vehicles end up killing people than do the guns out there. Vehicles are not designed to kill, but they still do a better job of it than guns do.

Anonymous said...

Now the pundits say we should fix France after the horrible event. Every European country should help first and then us - last.

hermit thrush said...

7:06: trump is vastly more corrupt than the clintons. (which, yes, is really saying something.)

Max Volume said...

Anything larger than a standard size pick-up truck should be labeled an "Assault Truck" and banned!

We can't have folks just going around and running over people when pedestrians have the right of way.

Anonymous said...

Isn't it amazing that 8:38 has to explain to our local war hero and past King of Korea what guns really are about. Sad, as it were.

Anonymous said...

Hermie, Who would have thunk you were such an avowed socialist. Funny thing is that Bernie was a 2nd amendment proponent his entire life.

But The Socialist's wife should be behind bars as well. Fact, that Bernie's wife was head of that college in Burlington VT, she 'mismanaged' operating funds that belonged to the college. So that fine lady that appeared along her socialist husband often should have been tried for serious crimes. Instead they honored her by getting get rid of her with a parachute package.

The college never recovered and has closed their doors this year.

Open you peepers Hermie.

Anonymous said...

803, There is no argument. Why? Anything may be used to kill, EVERYTHING is not designed to facilitate killing. Guns were designed for killing. Period.

Your rationale is confused at best.

Good Lord, 806! Why so testy? :D

838, guns are only constitutionally protected for militias. Stop trying to rewrite the 2nd amendment.

Anonymous said...

Dannie/6:17, the militia is the people, the citizens. Grow up. That tired liberal bs gets old. Even the Supreme Court says so. Stop being such a dishonest puke. And again, what does a liberal, party owned golfer know about the Lord, as it were?

Anonymous said...

No Danny the Constitution does not say the right of the militia to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. It says the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. There is a clause in the same sentence that says a well regulated militia is essential to a free state, implying that is at least one reason why the right was given to the people but not implying it is the only reason the right was given to the people.

The Constitution uses the phrase "the people" several times in the bill of Rights and each time it refers to the people as individuals and as a group.

To further educate you education majors, I will also point out that the Constitution does not say:
"The right of the militia to be secure in their persons..."
nor does it say:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the militia."
Nor does it say:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the militia.

Anonymous said...

10:02

The content of the article does not support its premise.

Anonymous said...

653/846, So every citizen has "the right to keep and bear arms"?
Is that what the framers of the constitution intended? How about the felon down my street, with an assault conviction? Or the pedophile around the corner? The mentally deficient? My eight year old grandchild?
Is that your stance? Please tell me it is not.

Is there anyone you feel should not have a gun?

Again, both your collective logics, do not stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. :D