Utica Club Uncle Sam Stein Presented for My Political Acumen

Utica Club Uncle Sam Stein Presented for My Political Acumen
Judge-elect Langone Shows His Utica Roots

Friday, January 25, 2013

WDT: U.S. Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand to visit CAPC for weatherization support

     Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is in Watertown today to attend an event at the Community Action Planning Council in support of weatherization programs. Good topic on such a cold week.
      The Senator is not a frequent caller to upstate communities as is the states senior member of the Senate, Chuck Schumer.
       Ms. Gillibrand is still very popular, having won reelection last year with 72% of the vote.
      We welcome her as her support on a variety of issues is important. Clearly she will be in the Senate for some time to come.
      If she has national ambitions, there is a line already forming with two other prominent New Yorkers already in the queue.
Watertown Daily Times | U.S. Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand to visit CAPC for weatherization support

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good that she can take a break from her main agenda of making special laws to discriminate against men in favor of women. Some day black men might figure out that affirmative action was hijacked by men-hating -women and used as a tool to further discriminate against blacks.

Anonymous said...

Roger that, she really doesnt represent our best interests....

Anonymous said...

She doesnt' represent anything any more. Remember when she first ran for office. She actually had a brain. Now she does tag team shows with Addie Jenne. I wish I could see one. If they sold the DVD's we could balance the budget. Schmuck writes the script.

Anonymous said...

“Some day black men might figure out that affirmative action was hijacked by men-hating -women and used as a tool to further discriminate against blacks.”

And maybe white rural ignorant red necks like you might figure out that having their heads up there asses for prolonged periods deprives the brain of oxygen… but I doubt it.

Anonymous said...

10:31 your argument is compelling but not compelling enough to explain away the fact that affirmative action has been used to promote women more than any other group. And gone from meaning "affirmative" to quotas. Quotas require revers discrimination.

You and your party can harp about the appropriate term "binders" of women, while dismissing the affirmative action Mitt took. And dismissing the record of the Obama administration with women.

Only foolishest of fools would fall for your excuses. Be it, to give the finger to the first formidable female contender for POTUS in favor of a man, or the double standard you have for the womanizers in your party. Edward's, oval cigars or secret service welching on "secret services".

But God do you care! Oh my how you care so much. You care enough to create the most dependent female in all of history. Go victim hood! Go frees$tuff!

Anonymous said...

10:31AM, I agree. Interesting thoughts. Thanks.

Anonymous said...

10:31PM, I couldn’t have said it better, so true. Thanks for calling these guys out on their hypocrisy!